Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gender roles"
Dadsnagem2 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
This is covered in [[Gender]] already. --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 14:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | This is covered in [[Gender]] already. --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 14:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This one is incredible even by Conservapedia standards! "The traditional roles of men as breadwinners and women as homemakers" is an EXAMPLE of gender roles, not a definition. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 15:43, 22 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:43, February 22, 2008
That explains why in every instance and every culture all men and women fall into such rigid roles. After all if these roles were in fact constucted that would mean some got the short end of the stick. Now that we know the reasons are biological, no one needs to feel oppressed or oppressive.
Cut (entire contents of article):
- Gender role refers to the notion that the traits of men and women and their places in society are learned behavior, social constructs, or based on stereotypes, rather than biological differences between the sexes that men and women are born with.
I had a hard time parsing the grammar of this. Is this an assertion, or what?
I just want to know what a gender role *is*. Like daddy goes out to work, mommy stays home with the kids. --Ed Poor 13:13, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
This is covered in Gender already. --TrueGrit 14:16, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
This one is incredible even by Conservapedia standards! "The traditional roles of men as breadwinners and women as homemakers" is an EXAMPLE of gender roles, not a definition. Dadsnagem2 15:43, 22 February 2008 (EST)