2,014
edits
Changes
re: value judgement refs; unstub
Can't get much stubbier than that, but at least it's started! [[User:Human|Human]] 19:46, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
Can't get much stubbier than that, but at least it's started! [[User:Human|Human]] 19:46, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
:Ok then. Give me an hour.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 00:39, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
:Ok then. Give me an hour.[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 00:39, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
I suppose I am allowed to make value judgments in cases like this. ("big three", "...music beautifully crafted etc".)[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 01:50, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
I suppose I am allowed to make value judgments in cases like this. ("big three", "...music beautifully crafted etc".)[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 01:50, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
:Well, if it's true you can get away with it. Citing some musicologist or critic would be excellent form, of course. Both of those, at this distance in time, can be considered to be facts as determined by experts in the field, I would imagine. Of course, this is just me talking. I like how you moved the "papa" part so it makes more sense. PS, when you flesh these out like this, you can delete the "stub" template thing at the top of the talk page. [[User:Human|Human]] 12:10, 9 May 2007 (EDT)