Difference between revisions of "Talk:Jesus Christ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Atheists denying existence of historical Jesus?== | ==Atheists denying existence of historical Jesus?== | ||
I seriously challenge this and would like to see some evidence for it. As the article correctly notes, the historical evidence for the life of Jesus of Nazareth is very good. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:08, 22 February 2007 (EST) | I seriously challenge this and would like to see some evidence for it. As the article correctly notes, the historical evidence for the life of Jesus of Nazareth is very good. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 06:08, 22 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | The article still says "Occasionally someone denies the existence of Jesus, but few scholars take this seriously." No source is cited. ''Who,'' exactly, denies the existence of an historical Jesus of Nazareth? If this belief is widely held someone, somewhere ought to have published something about it and the publication ought to be cited. | ||
| + | |||
| + | There's no need to introduce this section with a straw man. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 21:24, 4 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:24, March 5, 2007
Atheists denying existence of historical Jesus?
I seriously challenge this and would like to see some evidence for it. As the article correctly notes, the historical evidence for the life of Jesus of Nazareth is very good. Dpbsmith 06:08, 22 February 2007 (EST)
The article still says "Occasionally someone denies the existence of Jesus, but few scholars take this seriously." No source is cited. Who, exactly, denies the existence of an historical Jesus of Nazareth? If this belief is widely held someone, somewhere ought to have published something about it and the publication ought to be cited.
There's no need to introduce this section with a straw man. Dpbsmith 21:24, 4 March 2007 (EST)