Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,900
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − + + +
Talk:Abrasiveness of Richard Dawkins (view source)
Revision as of 17:35, May 9, 2019
, 17:35, May 9, 2019no edit summary
==Richard Dawkins and anger==
==Richard Dawkins and anger==
Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
Just a suggestion, but should the article [[Richard Dawkins and anger]] be merged with this one? [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:48, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
:Separate issues. Plus, it is not worth the trouble. He is far, far less influential post [[Elevatorgate]] (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:11, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
:These are two separate issues. As can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=richard+dawkins+and+anger&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS771US771&oq=richard+dawkins+and+anger&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2.6014j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 HERE], Richard Dawkins has a reputation for being an angry man. He also has a reputation for being abrasive - especially when it comes to matters of religion/irreligion.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:35, 9 May 2019 (EDT)
Plus, it is not worth the trouble. He is far, far less influential post [[Elevatorgate]] (see: [[Richard Dawkins' loss of influence]]).[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:11, 9 May 2019 (EDT)