Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 29: Line 29:  
8. Suppose Anthony owns a company having marginal costs of $5 for all his units.  If he sells only one, then he reaps $11; selling two fetches a price of $10 piece; selling 3 attains a price of $9; selling four reaps $8; Q=5 would have P=$7; Q=6 has P=$6, etc.  A competitive firm would have the same cost and demand numbers.  What does Anthony sell at, and what is the social cost of his monopoly?
 
8. Suppose Anthony owns a company having marginal costs of $5 for all his units.  If he sells only one, then he reaps $11; selling two fetches a price of $10 piece; selling 3 attains a price of $9; selling four reaps $8; Q=5 would have P=$7; Q=6 has P=$6, etc.  A competitive firm would have the same cost and demand numbers.  What does Anthony sell at, and what is the social cost of his monopoly?
   −
'''If Anthony's company has monopoly and a marginal cost of $5 per widget, then using the described demand curve, his company should sell three widgets at $9 apiece or 4 widgets at $8 apiece. Either approach will give Anthony's company a profit of $12.
+
'''If Anthony's company has monopoly and a marginal cost of $5 per widget, then using the described demand curve, his company should sell three widgets at $9 apiece or 4 widgets at $8 apiece. Either approach will give Anthony's company a profit of $12.'''
   −
If Anthony sells only three widgets at $9, then that is four less than what a competitive market would sell. The social cost is the sum of (P-MC) over each of the withheld units, noting that the social cost for each withheld unit is different because the unit goes unsold at a different P.  
+
'''If Anthony sells only three widgets at $9, then that is four less than what a competitive market would sell. The social cost is the sum of (P-MC) over each of the withheld units, noting that the social cost for each withheld unit is different because the unit goes unsold at a different P.'''
   −
We assume that society would have purchased the unit at slightly less than the higher price, such $6 minus an infinitesimal amount. When the price went from $5 to $6, one unit went unsold and the loss to society was '''almost''' (P-MC=$6-$5=$1).  Likewise, another unit went unsold at $7 (P-MC=$2), another unit went unsold at $8 and another unit went unsold at $9. That total social cost is '''almost''' $1 + $2 + $3 + $4 = $10.  
+
'''We assume that society would have purchased the unit at slightly less than the higher price, such $6 minus an infinitesimal amount. When the price went from $5 to $6, one unit went unsold and the loss to society was almost (P-MC=$6-$5=$1).  Likewise, another unit went unsold at $7 (P-MC=$2), another unit went unsold at $8 and another unit went unsold at $9. That total social cost is '''almost''' $1 + $2 + $3 + $4 = $10.'''
   −
If instead Anthony sold 4 units at $8, then the social cost is '''almost''' $1 + $2 + $3 = $6.  The "almost" is so close to the number that we drop the "almost" and simply provide the number as the estimated social cost.'''
+
'''If instead Anthony sold 4 units at $8, then the social cost is almost $1 + $2 + $3 = $6.  The "almost" is so close to the number that we drop the "almost" and simply provide the number as the estimated social cost.
    
'''Honors''': 9. Estimates are not very accurate about homeschooling, but some guess that 1 out of every 25 students is homeschooled.  At what level or fraction would homeschooling end the public school monopoly?  Discuss.
 
'''Honors''': 9. Estimates are not very accurate about homeschooling, but some guess that 1 out of every 25 students is homeschooled.  At what level or fraction would homeschooling end the public school monopoly?  Discuss.
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789

edits

Navigation menu