Changes

348 bytes added ,  04:54, May 14, 2007
no edit summary
Line 541: Line 541:  
::: OK.  Done.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::: OK.  Done.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::: Oop.  You reverted the edit.  Too controversial?  I thought we didn't censor.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:50, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 
::: Oop.  You reverted the edit.  Too controversial?  I thought we didn't censor.  --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 00:50, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: Horace, your "example" did not involve any admission of deceit, any charges of deceit, or any embrace of any deceit.  Moreover, appeal of this opinion and the dictum was prevented, so it was never reviewed and tested independently.  Your example is nothing like the other listed examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:54, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits