Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
9 bytes removed ,  05:30, June 29, 2020
- semantic errror
Line 13: Line 13:  
It is shocking that people outside of government readily admit to [[felon]]ious leaking of classified information. In January 2017 the ''[[New York Times]]'' reported, {{Quotebox|"In its final days, the [[Obama administration]] has expanded the power of the [[National Security Agency]] to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections."<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html ]</ref>}} The expansion of the order made it difficult to narrow in on leaks.<ref>http://circa.com/politics/some-us-intelligence-officials-want-trump-to-rescind-obamas-expansion-of-nsa-data</ref> Farkas' use of the term "people on the hill" refers to people outside the [[Executive Branch]] - Congressional staff which numbers into the tens of thousands. Many staffers have press contacts and are sources of leaks. Once the materials fell into their hands, many partisan staffers then became armchair counter-intelligence sleuths, combing  through the leaked material, feeding their [[mainstream media|mainstream]] sources with their latest pet theories on Donald Trump being in the pay of the [[KGB]], and taking to [[Twitter]] threads with extended narratives full of speculation.
 
It is shocking that people outside of government readily admit to [[felon]]ious leaking of classified information. In January 2017 the ''[[New York Times]]'' reported, {{Quotebox|"In its final days, the [[Obama administration]] has expanded the power of the [[National Security Agency]] to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections."<ref>[https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/us/politics/nsa-gets-more-latitude-to-share-intercepted-communications.html ]</ref>}} The expansion of the order made it difficult to narrow in on leaks.<ref>http://circa.com/politics/some-us-intelligence-officials-want-trump-to-rescind-obamas-expansion-of-nsa-data</ref> Farkas' use of the term "people on the hill" refers to people outside the [[Executive Branch]] - Congressional staff which numbers into the tens of thousands. Many staffers have press contacts and are sources of leaks. Once the materials fell into their hands, many partisan staffers then became armchair counter-intelligence sleuths, combing  through the leaked material, feeding their [[mainstream media|mainstream]] sources with their latest pet theories on Donald Trump being in the pay of the [[KGB]], and taking to [[Twitter]] threads with extended narratives full of speculation.
   −
That Farkas was an active, willing participant in the [[leftist]] [[conspiracy]] to undermine [[democracy]] is undeniable.<ref>https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/2/16/14630856/evelyn-farkas-trump-russia-flynn</ref><ref>One week before the 2016 election, Evelyn Farkas told the Warsaw Security Forum "if Donald Trump were elected I believe he would be [[impeach]]ed pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government. And I am not even joking." https://youtu.be/pl_RATH89UM <br/>One month after President Trump's inauguration, Farkas said "last summer I was getting winks and hints from inside that there was something really wrong here." Two weeks later, on March 2, she denied having inside information. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/08/ex-state-staffer-who-advocated-spying-on-trump-boasted-getting-winks-from-inside-obama-admin/</ref> The only question regarding her complicity is whether she was [[hoax]]ed by Brennan and the ''Steele dossier'', as the [[FISA court]] and millions of Americans were, as well.
+
That Farkas was an active, willing participant in the [[leftist]] [[conspiracy]] to undermine [[democracy]] is undeniable.<ref>https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/2/16/14630856/evelyn-farkas-trump-russia-flynn</ref><ref>One week before the 2016 election, Evelyn Farkas told the Warsaw Security Forum "if Donald Trump were elected I believe he would be [[impeach]]ed pretty quickly or somebody else would have to take over government. And I am not even joking." https://youtu.be/pl_RATH89UM <br/>One month after President Trump's inauguration, Farkas said "last summer I was getting winks and hints from inside that there was something really wrong here." Two weeks later, on March 2, she denied having inside information. https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/08/ex-state-staffer-who-advocated-spying-on-trump-boasted-getting-winks-from-inside-obama-admin/</ref> The only question regarding her complicity is whether she was [[hoax]]ed by Brennan and the ''Steele dossier'', as the [[FISA court]] and millions of Americans were.
    
In June 2020, Farkas, advocate for [[Burisma Holdings]], lost her Democratic House primary for New York’s 17th District.<ref>Goodman, Alana (June 24, 2020). [https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/evelyn-farkas-free-beacon-fourth/ "Evelyn Farkas came for the ''Free Beacon'', then she came in fourth: Obama alum bombs in congressional primary".] ''Washington Free Beacon''.</ref>
 
In June 2020, Farkas, advocate for [[Burisma Holdings]], lost her Democratic House primary for New York’s 17th District.<ref>Goodman, Alana (June 24, 2020). [https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/evelyn-farkas-free-beacon-fourth/ "Evelyn Farkas came for the ''Free Beacon'', then she came in fourth: Obama alum bombs in congressional primary".] ''Washington Free Beacon''.</ref>
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,697

edits

Navigation menu