Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
170 bytes added ,  18:33, March 9, 2007
add Susskind
Line 2: Line 2:     
There is much debate on whether string theory is truly scientific. Under the [[positivist]] philosophy, models must be falsifiable (i.e. it must be possible to define an experiment which will prove or disprove the theory) for them to qualify as science, and then they must survive these tests. In more general terms, a model is not scientific unless we can use it to make predictions about the world we observe, and it is consistent with those predictions. String theory has yet to yield a particular definitive test, or to produce any models that resemble any known particles or forces.
 
There is much debate on whether string theory is truly scientific. Under the [[positivist]] philosophy, models must be falsifiable (i.e. it must be possible to define an experiment which will prove or disprove the theory) for them to qualify as science, and then they must survive these tests. In more general terms, a model is not scientific unless we can use it to make predictions about the world we observe, and it is consistent with those predictions. String theory has yet to yield a particular definitive test, or to produce any models that resemble any known particles or forces.
 +
 +
Some string theorists, such as Leonard Susskind, say that string theory may not be testable but may still provide insights on multiple universes and intelligent design.

Navigation menu