Difference between revisions of "Talk:Xerxes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I think Ahasuerus could have been Artaxerxes instead of Xerxes.[[User:Panini|Panini]] 13:03, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
 
I think Ahasuerus could have been Artaxerxes instead of Xerxes.[[User:Panini|Panini]] 13:03, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
:I suggest you read [[Ahasuerus]] where it is manifest that "Ahasuerus" is more like a title and applicable to multiple individuals.--[[User:AnthonyPvanDuyn|AnthonyPvanDuyn]] ([[User talk:AnthonyPvanDuyn|talk]]) 13:32, 8 November 2020 (EST)
  
 
=Page Title=
 
=Page Title=
 
I believe this page needs to be ported to a new page entitled [[Xerxes I The Great]] in order to be more specific.  Meanwhile this page needs to be changed to a disambiguation page.--[[User:AnthonyPvanDuyn|AnthonyPvanDuyn]] ([[User talk:AnthonyPvanDuyn|talk]]) 13:26, 8 November 2020 (EST)
 
I believe this page needs to be ported to a new page entitled [[Xerxes I The Great]] in order to be more specific.  Meanwhile this page needs to be changed to a disambiguation page.--[[User:AnthonyPvanDuyn|AnthonyPvanDuyn]] ([[User talk:AnthonyPvanDuyn|talk]]) 13:26, 8 November 2020 (EST)

Revision as of 18:32, November 8, 2020

I think Ahasuerus could have been Artaxerxes instead of Xerxes.Panini 13:03, 8 July 2007 (EDT)

I suggest you read Ahasuerus where it is manifest that "Ahasuerus" is more like a title and applicable to multiple individuals.--AnthonyPvanDuyn (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2020 (EST)

Page Title

I believe this page needs to be ported to a new page entitled Xerxes I The Great in order to be more specific. Meanwhile this page needs to be changed to a disambiguation page.--AnthonyPvanDuyn (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2020 (EST)