Changes

In the 2016 Utah Republican caucus, where [[Utah]] Republicans voted to choose the party’s nominee for president in the [[2016 Presidential election]], the voters had the opportunity to vote using traditional methods or to vote online. For online voting, the Utah Republican Party used an internet voting system developed by the Smartmatic-Cybernetica Internet Voting Centre of Excellence, based in [[Estonia]].<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|url=http://estonianworld.com/technology/estonian-i-voting-software-used-in-utah-republican-caucus/|title=Estonian internet voting software used in Utah Republican caucus|date=2016-04-14|newspaper=Estonian World|language=en-US|access-date}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://e-estonia.com/estonian-e-solutions-everywhere/|title=Estonian E-solutions Everywhere - e-Estonia|website=e-estonia.com|access-date=|date=2016-05-23}}</ref>

In the 2016 Utah Republican caucus, where [[Utah]] Republicans voted to choose the party’s nominee for president in the [[2016 Presidential election]], the voters had the opportunity to vote using traditional methods or to vote online. For online voting, the Utah Republican Party used an internet voting system developed by the Smartmatic-Cybernetica Internet Voting Centre of Excellence, based in [[Estonia]].<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|url=http://estonianworld.com/technology/estonian-i-voting-software-used-in-utah-republican-caucus/|title=Estonian internet voting software used in Utah Republican caucus|date=2016-04-14|newspaper=Estonian World|language=en-US|access-date}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://e-estonia.com/estonian-e-solutions-everywhere/|title=Estonian E-solutions Everywhere - e-Estonia|website=e-estonia.com|access-date=|date=2016-05-23}}</ref>

Despite warnings from security experts,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Lapowsky|first1=Issie|title=Utah's Online Caucus Gives Security Experts Heart Attacks|url=https://www.wired.com/2016/03/security-experts-arent-going-like-utahs-online-primary/|accessdate=|work=WIRED|date=21 March 2016}}</ref> Utah Republican Party officials billed the online voting system, for which the state paid $150,000. Multiple issues occurred with the system, with voters receiving error messages and even being blocked from voting. Smartmatic received thousands of calls from Utah voters surrounding issues with the process. ''The Washington Post'' states that "the concern seems to be less with the technology and more with the security of the devices people use to vote".<ref name=":2">{{cite news|last1=Phillips|first1=Amber|title=Utah Republicans are holding a first-ever online presidential primary. And it's not going so well.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/22/utah-republicans-are-holding-a-first-ever-online-primary-and-its-not-going-so-well/|accessdate=|work=[[The Washington Post]]|date=22 March 2016}}</ref>  According to Joe Kiniry, the lead researcher of Galois, a technology research firm:<ref name="DOTsmart"/>{{quotebox|Several of us did a lightweight analysis of it remotely, to see how it was built and deployed and this sort of thing ... we found that they were using technologies that even modern Web programmers stay away from. ... It’s like the dumbest possible choices are being made by some of these companies with respect to deployed technology that should be mission-critical!}}

Despite warnings from security experts,<ref>{{cite news|last1=Lapowsky|first1=Issie|title=Utah's Online Caucus Gives Security Experts Heart Attacks|url=https://www.wired.com/2016/03/security-experts-arent-going-like-utahs-online-primary/|accessdate=|work=WIRED|date=21 March 2016}}</ref> Utah Republican Party officials billed the online voting system, for which the state paid $150,000. Multiple issues occurred with the system, with voters receiving error messages and even being blocked from voting. Smartmatic received thousands of calls from Utah voters surrounding issues with the process. ''The Washington Post'' states that "the concern seems to be less with the technology and more with the security of the devices people use to vote".<ref name=":2">{{cite news|last1=Phillips|first1=Amber|title=Utah Republicans are holding a first-ever online presidential primary. And it's not going so well.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/22/utah-republicans-are-holding-a-first-ever-online-primary-and-its-not-going-so-well/|accessdate=|work=[[The Washington Post]]|date=22 March 2016}}</ref>  According to Joe Kiniry, the lead researcher of Galois, a technology research firm:

{{quotebox|Several of us did a lightweight analysis of it remotely, to see how it was built and deployed and this sort of thing ... we found that they were using technologies that even modern Web programmers stay away from. ... It’s like the dumbest possible choices are being made by some of these companies with respect to deployed technology that should be mission-critical!}}

 

====Philippines====

====Philippines====

Smartmatic has been criticized by various entities for its motives and handling of elections in the Philippines.<ref name="IBONsmart">{{cite web|title=Automated Polls: Privatized elections, foreign-controlled democracy (Part 2)|url=http://ibon.org/2016/05/automated-polls-privatized-elections-foreign-controlled-democracy/|website=[[IBON Foundation]]|accessdate=}}</ref> In opinion polls, voters have approved of Smartmatic's automated system used by Comelec, with 84% of respondents stating that they had "big trust" in the automated process according to a June 2019 Pulse Asia Research poll.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2019/237275-filipinos-trust-results-elections-2019-pulse-asia-survey|title=Most Filipinos express 'big trust' in results of 2019 elections – Pulse Asia|last=Tomacruz|first=Sofia|website=[[Rappler]]|language=en|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref>

Smartmatic has been criticized by various entities for its motives and handling of elections in the Philippines.<ref name="IBONsmart">{{cite web|title=Automated Polls: Privatized elections, foreign-controlled democracy (Part 2)|url=http://ibon.org/2016/05/automated-polls-privatized-elections-foreign-controlled-democracy/|website=[[IBON Foundation]]|accessdate=}}</ref> In opinion polls, voters have approved of Smartmatic's automated system used by Comelec, with 84% of respondents stating that they had "big trust" in the automated process according to a June 2019 Pulse Asia Research poll.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.rappler.com/nation/politics/elections/2019/237275-filipinos-trust-results-elections-2019-pulse-asia-survey|title=Most Filipinos express 'big trust' in results of 2019 elections – Pulse Asia|last=Tomacruz|first=Sofia|website=[[Rappler]]|language=en|access-date=2019-08-30}}</ref>