Difference between revisions of "User talk:Sievert 81/drafts"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Blackpillers are leftwing. Some blackpillers claim to be rightwing, however the ones that do are almost exclusively neo-Nazis and thus leftwing instead. Better?
 
−
:What is the purpose of making any reference to "right-wing"? Alleged "right-wingers" tend to be [[individualism|individualist]]s, and not part of any organized [[collective]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:32, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
::Because a lot of them like to claim they are and fool a lot of people. I want to discredit them. [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:33, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
  
−
::(ec)For example, any alleged "right-winger" could see a "Unite the Right" rally was [[community organizer|community organized]] leftwing bait, and would stay miles away. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:35, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
:::How about 'Most blackpillers are far-left. There are 2 main types: Neo-Nazis and socialists. [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:36, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
::::Sounds good. My suggestion is, if the they are neo-Nazis, label them as such. Debating or discussing in mainspace whether godless socialists are God-fearing bible thumping right wingers on every page like this is somewhat pointless. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:41, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
:::::I'm working on articles for all the pill ideologies: pink (female version of blackpill), blue (liberal fact-denying), red (right-wing people who don't deny reality like bluepillers read: 95% of CP) and this one. [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:46, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
::::::A good rule of thumb to follow is, at CP we try to avoid filling up mainspace articles with MSM/DNC talking points. Just stick to the facts. Where refutation is necessary, it generally can be covered in its own subsection. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]</sup> 15:51, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 
−
:::::::Should I make a section in the blackpill article debunking that they are rightwing, or ignore it completely? [[User:Sievert 81|Sievert 81]] ([[User talk:Sievert 81|talk]]) 15:52, 5 December 2020 (EST)
 

Latest revision as of 02:18, December 8, 2020

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Sievert_81/drafts&oldid=1711732"