Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + +
add link to Analysis of the Lautenberg Amendment with emphasis on its harsh impact on military personnel
{{cquote|An individual falling within a statutory prohibition that can be constitutionally applied to some may still challenge whether the prohibition can be constitutionally applied to him. That fundamental principle should apply equally to the individual right enumerated in the Second Amendment. Harley plausibly claims that § 922(g)(9) cannot be constitutionally applied to him as an individual with a nearly thirty-year-old misdemeanor conviction for recklessly causing an offensive touching. We should not categorically reject that claim. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.}}
{{cquote|An individual falling within a statutory prohibition that can be constitutionally applied to some may still challenge whether the prohibition can be constitutionally applied to him. That fundamental principle should apply equally to the individual right enumerated in the Second Amendment. Harley plausibly claims that § 922(g)(9) cannot be constitutionally applied to him as an individual with a nearly thirty-year-old misdemeanor conviction for recklessly causing an offensive touching. We should not categorically reject that claim. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.}}
== See also ==
*[https://militarylawcenter.com/weapons-hold/ Analysis of the Lautenberg Amendment with emphasis on its harsh impact on military personnel]
== References ==
== References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}
[[category:Second Amendment]]
[[category:Second Amendment]]