Changes

NetChoice v. Paxton (view source)

Revision as of 18:43, September 18, 2022

392 bytes added , 18:43, September 18, 2022

no edit summary

Line 4: Line 4:

The panel majority cited about 130 precedents, while the dissent cited about 20.

+

== Panel Majority Reasoning ==

+

{{cquote|Under these precedents, a speech host must make one of two showings to mount a First Amendment challenge. It must show that the challenged law either (a) compels the host to speak or (b) restricts the host’s own speech. The Platforms cannot make either showing. And (c) the Platforms’ counterarguments are unpersuasive.<ref>Slip op. p. 27.</ref>}}

== Judge Jones' Concurrence ==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,493

edits