Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,819
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − + + +
Mar-a-Lago raid litigation (view source)
Revision as of 02:06, October 5, 2022
, 02:06, October 5, 2022Typically a high-profile application such as this is referred to the full U.S. Supreme Court by the Justice who receives it. A prompt schedule is usually issued by the Court of a response by the other side, in this case by the [[Department of Justice
'''Mar-a-Lago raid litigation''' included an emergency application to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] filed by [[Donald Trump]] on October 4, 2022<ref name="Application">https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22A283/242439/20221004150805615_22-%20Application%20for%20Stay.pdf</ref> concerning the unprecedented [[Mar-a-Lago raid]] on Trump's residence. The application cites 69 precedents in favor of overruling the [[Eleventh Circuit]] decision that partially stayed a good district court ruling:
'''Mar-a-Lago raid litigation''' included an emergency application to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] filed by [[Donald Trump]] on October 4, 2022<ref name="Application">https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22A283/242439/20221004150805615_22-%20Application%20for%20Stay.pdf</ref> concerning the unprecedented [[Mar-a-Lago raid]] on Trump's residence. The application cites 69 precedents in favor of overruling the [[Eleventh Circuit]] decision that partially stayed a good district court ruling.
Typically a high-profile application such as this is referred to the full [[U.S. Supreme Court]] by the Justice who receives it. A prompt schedule is usually issued by the Court of a response by the other side, in this case by the [[Department of Justice]].
== Arguments made ==
== Arguments made ==