Changes

*Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-OMat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977)  

*Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-OMat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477 (1977)  

*Chair King, Inc. v. Houston Cellular Corp., 131 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1997), ''abrogated on other grounds'', Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012)  

*Chair King, Inc. v. Houston Cellular Corp., 131 F.3d 507 (5th Cir. 1997), ''abrogated on other grounds'', Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 565 U.S. 368 (2012)  

*[[Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA]], 568 U.S. 398 (2013)  

*''[[Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA]]'', 568 U.S. 398 (2013) (a landmark 5-4 decision against [[standing]])

*''Clean Water Opportunities, Inc. v. Willamette Valley Co.'', 759 F. App’x 244 (5th Cir. 2019) (test for Section 2 of the [[Sherman Act]]: “(1) possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) acquired or maintained that power willfully, as distinguished from the power having arisen and continued by growth produced by the development of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident,” and the second test requires "a showing of exclusionary conduct”)

*''Clean Water Opportunities, Inc. v. Willamette Valley Co.'', 759 F. App’x 244 (5th Cir. 2019) (test for Section 2 of the [[Sherman Act]]: “(1) possesses monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) acquired or maintained that power willfully, as distinguished from the power having arisen and continued by growth produced by the development of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident,” and the second test requires "a showing of exclusionary conduct”)

*Coinmach Corp v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013)  

*Coinmach Corp v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp., 417 S.W.3d 909 (Tex. 2013)