Changes

Finally, a voice of reason! Thank you Fox. Can you tell me how to tell if a site is a wikimirror site? I am tired of being falsely accused and threatened by RobS. I am tired of the vandalism RobS perpetrates on perfectly valid additions to articles that follow all Conservapedia guidelines (although I admit I am in the dark about what sites and what sites are not the dreaded wikimirrorr sites). NitramNos 16:00, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

Finally, a voice of reason! Thank you Fox. Can you tell me how to tell if a site is a wikimirror site? I am tired of being falsely accused and threatened by RobS. I am tired of the vandalism RobS perpetrates on perfectly valid additions to articles that follow all Conservapedia guidelines (although I admit I am in the dark about what sites and what sites are not the dreaded wikimirrorr sites). NitramNos 16:00, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

:NitramNos, you should be able to tell if a site has copied articles from Wikipedia by looking for somewhere on the page where they say so.  Wikipedia material is copyrighted under the GNU licence, which means (among other things) that other sites can copy it, but ''must acknowledge'' that it came from Wikipedia.  It's always possible, of course, that a site might copy it without acknowledging it (thus breaking the law), but normally it will be acknowledged, so look for that acknowledgement; that's how you can tell.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:51, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

:NitramNos, you should be able to tell if a site has copied articles from Wikipedia by looking for somewhere on the page where they say so.  Wikipedia material is copyrighted under the GNU licence, which means (among other things) that other sites can copy it, but ''must acknowledge'' that it came from Wikipedia.  It's always possible, of course, that a site might copy it without acknowledging it (thus breaking the law), but normally it will be acknowledged, so look for that acknowledgement; that's how you can tell.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:51, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

::I get it. I will certainlyy check for the GNU license infformation next time I choose a reference. Thank you. Bu while we're on the subject of accusations, how do you explain RobS's constant accusations of subterfuge and "trying to hide a wikimirror." And accusations of being anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit? Acusations that I am a troll and engaged in vandalism? I apologize for my ignorance regarding wikimirrors. The accusations against me go a good deal farther than that, and I believe they are way out of line. NitramNos 21:59, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

::I get it. I will certainly check for the GNU license information at the bottom next time I choose a reference. Thank you. But while we're on the subject of accusations, how do you explain RobS's constant accusations of subterfuge and "trying to hide a wikimirror." And accusations of being anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit? Accusations that I am a troll and engaged in vandalism? I apologize for my ignorance regarding wikimirrors. The accusations against me go a good deal farther than that, and I believe they are way out of line. NitramNos 21:59, 9 June 2007 (EDT)

:::::The clock is running on NitramNos.  The lesson to be taken from all this is, the bigotry that Wikipedia is known for ''will not'' be imposed on us here.  We shall determine our own content, from constuctive and cooperative editors, not trolls attempting to spoon feed us wiki-pap during the incessant vandalism intended to distract us.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:17, 8 June 2007 (EDT)

:::::The clock is running on NitramNos.  The lesson to be taken from all this is, the bigotry that Wikipedia is known for ''will not'' be imposed on us here.  We shall determine our own content, from constuctive and cooperative editors, not trolls attempting to spoon feed us wiki-pap during the incessant vandalism intended to distract us.  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 18:17, 8 June 2007 (EDT)