Difference between revisions of "Talk:Political Profiling"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: "A internet user's postings under either their real life identity of pseudonym may be "profiled" for their ideological convictions based upon editing patterns, interests, subject matter, c...)
 
(What is you question?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Is the above related to what you are saying? Because I am not sure I understand your article.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 23:05, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 
Is the above related to what you are saying? Because I am not sure I understand your article.[[User:Associate|Associate]] 23:05, 10 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:16, June 11, 2007

"A internet user's postings under either their real life identity of pseudonym may be "profiled" for their ideological convictions based upon editing patterns, interests, subject matter, common references, or declared beliefs. The profile is then pigeon-holed into predetermined character assessments..."

"James, please disclose your political point-of-view along with that of the "scholar". Let me guess: do both of you oppose prayer in the classrooms of public schools? Enough said.--Aschlafly 13:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)"

Is the above related to what you are saying? Because I am not sure I understand your article.Associate 23:05, 10 June 2007 (EDT)

Are you alleging Andy has cyberstalked, harrassed, and publicly defamed an individual with guilt by association smears, alleging someone holds partisan, extreme, or racist views that the person in reality does not? RobS 23:16, 10 June 2007 (EDT)