Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/Forecasting"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 81: Line 81:
 
*[https://investorplace.com/smartmoney/2023/02/the-latest-megatrend-might-be-in-your-backyard/ Eric Fry - Global trends]
 
*[https://investorplace.com/smartmoney/2023/02/the-latest-megatrend-might-be-in-your-backyard/ Eric Fry - Global trends]
  
−
=== Other Notable stock investment specialist ===
+
=== Other Notable stock investment specialists ===
  
−
Motley Fool:
+
'''Motley Fool:'''
  
 
*[https://www.fool.com/ Motley Fool]
 
*[https://www.fool.com/ Motley Fool]
  
 
*[https://www.fool.com/premium/stock-advisor/landing/ Motley Fool Stock Advisory service]
 
*[https://www.fool.com/premium/stock-advisor/landing/ Motley Fool Stock Advisory service]
 +
  
 
Growth investor:  
 
Growth investor:  

Revision as of 11:03, September 15, 2023

Economics

General forecasting

Economic forecasting

Yield curve

The difficulty of long term economic forecasting for various companies/sectors/countries

Difficulty of short term economic forecasting due to various factors

Videos/podcast, investing/business/trends

Stock investing: Good opportunities

MOAT:

Investing in blue chip art:

Angel investing study - 27% return - Kaufman study:

Stock investing experts

Mark Lipias

Mark Lipacis: Out of more than 8,000 total analysts in the TipRanks database, Jefferies analyst Mark Lipacis is rated No. 1 based on his stock-picking track record over the past 10 years. Lipacis has an impressive 73% success rate on his stock ratings, and his 498 stock picks generated an average return of 30.3%.[1]

Eric Fry

Other Notable stock investment specialists

Motley Fool:


Growth investor:

Louis Navellier:

Tech investor:

General economic trend forecasting related info

Sources:

Economics mixed with right-wing political ideology:

America will suffer a great depression in 2030:

Semi doom and gloomers:

Jim Rogers:

Marc Faber:

Nouriel Roubini:

Gary Shilling:

Doom and gloomers:

Prediction markets

Political forecasting

1. Political expert forecasts

2. Arthur C. Brooks wrote in his article Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being: "A 2012 survey conducted by Fairleigh Dickinson University asked a sample of Americans about their news-consumption habits, and quizzed them about U.S. and international political and economic events. They found that those watching the most partisan television news sources—on both the left and the right—were often less knowledgeable about world events than those who consumed no news at all."[1]

3. Political betting markets have better accuracy than polls and pundits.

References

  1. ↑ Reading Too Much Political News Is Bad for Your Well-Being by Arthur C. Brooks, The Atlantic, 2020