144
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: + + + +
→suggestion: new section
I assume the photo of her with Chavez is supposed to say she's anti-american? Whether or not you agree with the woman everyone must admit that she got into the game as a result of her son's death. So if there is to be a picture of her with someone that is part of her public story then maybe it should be her son. Or would that be too politically biased? [[User:Priestspez|Priestspez]] 02:22, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
I assume the photo of her with Chavez is supposed to say she's anti-american? Whether or not you agree with the woman everyone must admit that she got into the game as a result of her son's death. So if there is to be a picture of her with someone that is part of her public story then maybe it should be her son. Or would that be too politically biased? [[User:Priestspez|Priestspez]] 02:22, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
:The photo does not say anything other than that she traveled to Venezuala to meet with Chavez (apparently at his invitation) and make public radio broadcasts with Chavez critical of US foreign policy. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:38, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
:The photo does not say anything other than that she traveled to Venezuala to meet with Chavez (apparently at his invitation) and make public radio broadcasts with Chavez critical of US foreign policy. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:38, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
== suggestion ==
This article appears to be locked so I can't edit it, but can I suggest removal of the word "recently" in the last sentence of the 1st paragraph? Bush has not been President for quite a while, so I don't think she recently called for his impeachment. A small point, but I think it would make the article look better. Thanks. [[User:AngusT|AngusT]] 10:40, 18 August 2010 (EDT)