Difference between revisions of "Talk:Iraq"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Failed State Index: a fair assessment)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
As the section in question was about the war and its aftermath, and mentions nothing about democracy in Iraq, I have changed the heading. [[User:EnFrancaisSVP|EnFrancaisSVP]] 21:17, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 
As the section in question was about the war and its aftermath, and mentions nothing about democracy in Iraq, I have changed the heading. [[User:EnFrancaisSVP|EnFrancaisSVP]] 21:17, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== I have corrected two straightforward factual errors in this page:
 +
1) Hussein did not "throw UNSCOM out." It left in advance of the Clinton/Blair bombing campaign.
 +
2) Hussein did not "refuse to step down." He attempted to negotiate this, but Bush ignored him.
 +
 +
Both of these facts can easily be confirmed by Googling them.
 +
 +
But I bet it will still be less than 24 hours before someone puts the lies back in the article.
 +
 +
[[User:NickDanger|NickDanger]] 13:09, 24 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 18:09, January 24, 2008

This page is obviously way too short for the amount of history this country has. Nothing of former rulers and historical events have been mentioned, making this a non-useful article for general knowledge/research purposes.--Atomicwaist 21:47, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

  [edit] Moved stub to bottom.--Atomicwaist 12:27, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

For sure, Iraq just exists since its invasion by the USA in 2003... If I remember well my lessons, this land has seen much more history than lots of others. Isn't it the place were the first civilizations appeared. Oups, this is not believeable...

If you want to expand on this, go ahead. Iraq is the elephant in the livingroom of the current political landscape, so I'm not surprised nobody wants to touch this listing. --Sandbagger 16:24, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Line Breaks?

What is with the no line breaks? One paragraph makes this entry look very poor. Paulwasasaint 17:11, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Edit conflict!

That wasnt vandalism from me -- the page took so long to load, it had been undone by the time I undid it :( if u see what i mean File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 06:12, 3 June 2007 (EDT) I won't attempt to undo it again, as the same thing may happen. I'll leave it for a sysop who has rollback. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 06:15, 3 June 2007 (EDT)

Failed State Index

Source reads, "third annual Failed States Index"; now beg pardon, this appears from its name to be a concocted "survey" for aiming at a politcal impact. The Fund for Peace, Morton Halperin, the VVAW, World Peace Council probably doesn't really add up to a qualified source we wish to rely. RobS 17:11, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

Possibly, but this was reported on CNN and Yahoo. Rather than delete it, maybe you could find some sites that refute it. Maestro 21:13, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

I don't wish to say blanketly the source, Fund for Peace, is a left-wing commie front organization, because I believe it does do some good work in some parts of the world. But it would not be a fair assessment to say this organization is non-partisan, and this particular survey, given this particular name, at this particular juncture in history, IMHO, was created for exactly a partisan prejudicial purpose. RobS 21:19, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

"Democratic Iraq"

As the section in question was about the war and its aftermath, and mentions nothing about democracy in Iraq, I have changed the heading. EnFrancaisSVP 21:17, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

== I have corrected two straightforward factual errors in this page: 1) Hussein did not "throw UNSCOM out." It left in advance of the Clinton/Blair bombing campaign. 2) Hussein did not "refuse to step down." He attempted to negotiate this, but Bush ignored him.

Both of these facts can easily be confirmed by Googling them.

But I bet it will still be less than 24 hours before someone puts the lies back in the article.

NickDanger 13:09, 24 January 2008 (EST)