| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | [[File:David Rockefeller - NARA - 1953.jpg|thumb|200px|[[David Rockefeller]], a prominent 20th-century globalist and "uniparty" representative]] | | [[File:David Rockefeller - NARA - 1953.jpg|thumb|200px|[[David Rockefeller]], a prominent 20th-century globalist and "uniparty" representative]] |
| | {{See also|Establishment}} | | {{See also|Establishment}} |
| − | The "'''Uniparty'''" is a term that describes the [[globalist]] establishment's control over politics and policy to the extent that every or nearly every major political party or politician are controlled by them and, thus, have far more in common than different, policy-wise. It is essentially synonymous with the [[deep state]], as it retains control almost regardless of which political party or politician is elected. | + | The "'''Uniparty'''" is a term that describes the [[globalist]] establishment's control over politics and policy to the extent that every or nearly every major political party or politician is controlled by them and, thus, has far more policies in common than any differences. The term "uniparty" is essentially synonymous with the [[deep state]], as it retains control almost regardless of which political party or politician is elected. |
| | | | |
| | An example is the general movement by both the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States to continually expand the size and reach of the Federal government into every area of one's life, the only significant difference being whether the apparatus should be run by [[Unionism|unionized]] government employees (the [[Democrat Party]] approach) or private-sector contractors (the [[Republican Party]] approach). '''''Specific Republican examples of the uniparty are Senate Minority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]] and House Speaker [[Mike Johnson]], as of May 2024'''''. | | An example is the general movement by both the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States to continually expand the size and reach of the Federal government into every area of one's life, the only significant difference being whether the apparatus should be run by [[Unionism|unionized]] government employees (the [[Democrat Party]] approach) or private-sector contractors (the [[Republican Party]] approach). '''''Specific Republican examples of the uniparty are Senate Minority Leader [[Mitch McConnell]] and House Speaker [[Mike Johnson]], as of May 2024'''''. |
| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| | {{cquote|The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area…. | | {{cquote|The word “Establishment” is a general term for the power elite in international finance, business, the professions and government, largely from the northeast, who wield most of the power regardless of who is in the White House. Most people are unaware of this “legitimate Mafia.” Yet the power of the Establishment makes itself felt from the professor who seeks a foundation grant, to the candidate for a cabinet post or State Department job. It affects the nation’s policies in almost every area…. |
| | | | |
| − | What is the Establishment’s viewpoint? Through the [past four] administrations, its ideology is constant. That the best way to fight Communism is by a One World Socialist state governed by “experts” like themselves. The result has been policies which favor the growth of the superstate....<ref>McManus, John F. (July 30, 2016). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/23762-the-hidden-establishment The Hidden Establishment]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 5, 2018.</ref>}} | + | What is the Establishment’s viewpoint? Through the [past four] administrations, its ideology has been constant: that the best way to fight Communism is by a One World Socialist state governed by “experts” like themselves. The result has been policies that favor the growth of the superstate....<ref>McManus, John F. (July 30, 2016). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/23762-the-hidden-establishment The Hidden Establishment]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 5, 2018.</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| | An example of how traditional political affiliations are meaningless is [[European Commission]] president [[Jean-Claude Juncker]] – a member of a supposedly "center-right" party – who commemorated Marx's birthday in the latter's birth town, with Juncker defending Marx, advocating for having the EU follow Marx's lead, and unveiling a statue of him donated by China's communist government.<ref>Multiple references: | | An example of how traditional political affiliations are meaningless is [[European Commission]] president [[Jean-Claude Juncker]] – a member of a supposedly "center-right" party – who commemorated Marx's birthday in the latter's birth town, with Juncker defending Marx, advocating for having the EU follow Marx's lead, and unveiling a statue of him donated by China's communist government.<ref>Multiple references: |