Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bible"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
no discussion of the Bible? [[User:Muchodelcrazy|Muchodelcrazy]] 00:19, 8 March 2007 (EST) | no discussion of the Bible? [[User:Muchodelcrazy|Muchodelcrazy]] 00:19, 8 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Article is too brief!== | ||
| + | This is '''The Bible!''' Don't you think the Word of God deserves a greater article, one with more detail on the subject and its history? I think so! In fact, I think I will start out by doing just that, and here's the proposed layout: | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Intro | ||
| + | *Brief listing of the books within, divided of course into Old/New Testaments. | ||
| + | *History of the Bible...as in '''who wrote it'''. | ||
| + | *Why the world accepts/rejects it. | ||
| + | *Current status | ||
| + | *Include pics and charts and links. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What say you? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 00:28, 11 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:28, March 11, 2007
no discussion of the Bible? Muchodelcrazy 00:19, 8 March 2007 (EST)
Article is too brief!
This is The Bible! Don't you think the Word of God deserves a greater article, one with more detail on the subject and its history? I think so! In fact, I think I will start out by doing just that, and here's the proposed layout:
- Intro
- Brief listing of the books within, divided of course into Old/New Testaments.
- History of the Bible...as in who wrote it.
- Why the world accepts/rejects it.
- Current status
- Include pics and charts and links.
What say you? Karajou 00:28, 11 March 2007 (EST)