Changes

657 bytes added ,  23:18, June 19, 2025
writing style
Line 86: Line 86:     
On the [[Fourth Amendment]], Gorsuch alone espouses a view that it should be reinterpreted based on property ownership, rather than privacy expectations.  Litigants in Fourth Amendment cases, including the one decided by the Supreme Court in June 2018, do not typically assert such an argument.
 
On the [[Fourth Amendment]], Gorsuch alone espouses a view that it should be reinterpreted based on property ownership, rather than privacy expectations.  Litigants in Fourth Amendment cases, including the one decided by the Supreme Court in June 2018, do not typically assert such an argument.
 +
 +
==Writing style==
 +
Justice Gorsuch has a non-conventional writing style that repeatedly uses "I" and superfluous phrases like, "Start with how I would analyze this case" and "As I see it" (used twice to open two paragraphs in a 14-paragraph section of the same opinion).<ref name="EPA">
 +
''EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refin., L.L.C.'', No. 23-1229, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 2381 (June 18, 2025) (Gorsuch, J., dissenting)</ref> In a dissent on June 18, 2025, Gorsuch wrote:
 +
{{cquote|As I read it, the Clean Air Act provides a clear rule for cases like this one. Applying that rule here, I would direct the parties to the appropriate regional circuit.<ref name="EPA"/>}}
    
==References==
 
==References==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,455

edits