Changes

}}

}}

}}

}}

'''Neil McGill Gorsuch''' (born August 29, 1967, age {{age|1967|8|29}}) is an [[Associate Justice]] on the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]].<ref>Gorsuch was previously a federal appellate judge on the [[Tenth Circuit]].</ref> In his first full Term Gorsuch had a more [[liberal]] voting record than even the socially liberal Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]].<ref name="Reason">, according to the impartial ''Reason Magazine'': https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/27/neil-gorsuch-was-more-liberal-than-antho</ref> Gorsuch authored the decision that unleashed [[lawfare]] for the [[transgender movement]], in ''[[Bostock v. Clayton County]]'' (June 15, 2020), and has also ruled in favor of the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[illegal aliens]] to give [[liberal]]s an unearned majority on these issues.  Gorsuch, who was fed by [[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] [[Deep State]] types to Trump for nomination, wrote the concurrence in the 2023 [[affirmative action]] case that is being used by [[liberal]] [[colleges]] to terminate their pro-[[American]] legacy admission preferences.<ref>[https://www.aol.com/news/top-schools-begin-dropping-legacy-193220974.html Top Schools dropping legacy admissions.]</ref>

'''Neil McGill Gorsuch''' (born August 29, 1967, age {{age|1967|8|29}}) is an [[Associate Justice]] on the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]].<ref>Gorsuch was previously a federal appellate judge on the [[Tenth Circuit]].</ref> In his first full Term Gorsuch had a more [[liberal]] voting record than even the socially liberal Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]].<ref name="Reason">, according to the impartial ''Reason Magazine'': https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/27/neil-gorsuch-was-more-liberal-than-antho</ref> Gorsuch authored the decision that unleashed [[lawfare]] for the [[transgender movement]], in ''[[Bostock v. Clayton County]]'' (June 15, 2020), and has also ruled in favor of the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[illegal aliens]] to give [[liberal]]s an unearned majority on these issues.  Fed by [[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] [[Deep State]] types to Trump for nomination, Gorsuch wrote the concurrence in the 2023 [[affirmative action]] case that is being used by [[liberal]] [[colleges]] to terminate their pro-[[American]] legacy admission preferences.<ref>[https://www.aol.com/news/top-schools-begin-dropping-legacy-193220974.html Top Schools dropping legacy admissions.]</ref>

Gorsuch's ''Bostock'' pro-transgender decision is called the new "''[[Roe v. Wade]]''," because it set the precedent -- without any [[textualism|textual]] basis in law -- for [[homosexual]]s and [[transgender]]s to sue for alleged discrimination against employers, private schools, and virtually any institution. “A Constitutional Right to Gender Surgery? An appeals court uses the ''Bostock'' ruling to usurp state law, in a new version of ''Roe v. Wade'',” wrote the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' in a May 11, 2024 editorial.  As the chief architect of transgender rights, Gorsuch subsequently "never asked a question, which is highly unusual" when Tennessee's law banning transgender operations on children was argued before the Supreme Court on December 4.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/scotus-transgender-care-ban-12-04-24/index.html</ref>

Gorsuch's ''Bostock'' pro-transgender decision is called the new "''[[Roe v. Wade]]''," because it set the precedent -- without any [[textualism|textual]] basis in law -- for [[homosexual]]s and [[transgender]]s to sue for alleged discrimination against employers, private schools, and virtually any institution. “A Constitutional Right to Gender Surgery? An appeals court uses the ''Bostock'' ruling to usurp state law, in a new version of ''Roe v. Wade'',” wrote the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' in a May 11, 2024 editorial.  As the chief architect of transgender rights, Gorsuch subsequently "never asked a question, which is highly unusual" when Tennessee's law banning transgender operations on children was argued before the Supreme Court on December 4.<ref>https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/scotus-transgender-care-ban-12-04-24/index.html</ref>