Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chemistry"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and "general", which isn't even a field of chemistry. It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the onl...) |
(unsigned and reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and "general", which isn't even a field of chemistry. It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the only courses that contained one adjective. What about inorganic chemistry (which deserves the definition given to general), analytical chemistry, or biochemistry. Also, physical is not a sub group, subgroups are ones such as bioanalytical chemistry or physical organic or physical inorganic etc. PLEASE someone do this article justice. | + | There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and "general", which isn't even a field of chemistry. It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the only courses that contained one adjective. What about inorganic chemistry (which deserves the definition given to general), analytical chemistry, or biochemistry. Also, physical is not a sub group, subgroups are ones such as bioanalytical chemistry or physical organic or physical inorganic etc. PLEASE someone do this article justice. {{unsigned|DrCody}} |
| + | |||
| + | :Perhaps you could have a go at it? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:58, July 5, 2007
There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and "general", which isn't even a field of chemistry. It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the only courses that contained one adjective. What about inorganic chemistry (which deserves the definition given to general), analytical chemistry, or biochemistry. Also, physical is not a sub group, subgroups are ones such as bioanalytical chemistry or physical organic or physical inorganic etc. PLEASE someone do this article justice. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DrCody (talk)
- Perhaps you could have a go at it? Philip J. Rayment 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT)