Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 98:
Line 98: + + + +
to: Ray, from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative
:Considering how [[Draft]] may later be used for the, well, draft, the draft should possibly be made at [[Theistic Evolution/draft]] </suggestion from somebody who only noticed that the article imploded after all the action happened> --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:36, 8 March 2007 (EST)
:Considering how [[Draft]] may later be used for the, well, draft, the draft should possibly be made at [[Theistic Evolution/draft]] </suggestion from somebody who only noticed that the article imploded after all the action happened> --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 19:36, 8 March 2007 (EST)
:: Ok, pursuant to these comments, I have started a draft, hopefully with enough sourcing. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:47, 8 March 2007 (EST)
:: Ok, pursuant to these comments, I have started a draft, hopefully with enough sourcing. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 19:47, 8 March 2007 (EST)
== to: Ray, from Admin/SYSOP with the username Conservative ==
Ray, I do know that you are knowledgeable on the creo/evo issue, however, I just reasonably ask that you footnote your material in regards to its internal statements given the contentious nature of the creo/evo issue. I don't think you should just throw in the towel and give up. I believe you could add some valuable input to a article if you wanted to. I also ask that you refrain from inflamatory characterizations like "sheeps clothing" which I also believe is necesary for an encyclopedia to have. An encyclopedia is much more authoritative in tone if it uses non inflamatory language. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:07, 8 March 2007 (EST)conservative