Changes

Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 14:49, February 10, 2026

24 bytes added , February 10

no edit summary

Line 259: Line 259:

Promoting usernames: Alexandraaaacs1989 (RfC on consensus), Aquillion (supported), Bogazicili (sources), Coining (RfC expansion), NadVolum (inclusion), Greensminded24 (templates/lead), Cinaroot, Darouet, David A, Dualpendel, Newimpartial, Raskolnikov.Rev, Smallangryplanet, Tashmetu, VidanaliK. Banned ones like Selfstudier, Nableezy promoted pre-ban

−

5. Did the so-called "reliable sources" include (Islamist bigot, semi-dictator, expansionist [a]) Erdoğan's TRT/Anadolu; Hamas-linked Euro-Med; MSF (- whose members included Hamas [b]); (pro-Hamas/Islamism-) Qatar's [c] Hamas-linked al Jazeera [d], MEE; anti-Israel (at times, blatantly anti-Jewish) activists/"journalists" of Haaretz [e]? And were the UN's

+

5. Did the so-called "reliable sources" include (Islamist bigot, semi-dictator, expansionist [a]) [[Erdoğan]]'s TRT/Anadolu; Hamas-linked [[Euro-Med]]; [[MSF]] (- whose members included Hamas [b]); (pro-Hamas/[[Islamism]]-) [[Qatar]]'s [c] Hamas-linked [[al-Jazeera]] [d], MEE; anti-Israel (at times, blatantly anti-Jewish) activists/"journalists" of Haaretz [e]? And were the UN's

[[United_Nations#Francesca_Albanese|Francesca Albanese]] (with an antisemitic record at least since 2014 and dubbed 21st-century Goebbels [f]) and the UN commission (by team Pillay/Kothary - of the 2022 "Jewish control" trope [g]) as well as the $30 membership, no qualifications, activists and others [h] IAGS central to it? Were [[IAGS]]'s only 28% responders' votes framed as "scholars?" Given that IAGS includes activists and artists among its members, and that only 28% voted, how can we be sure that most of those who participated were not activists? Was Louis-Klein critique of Dirk Moses, editor of the Journal of Genocide Research included?

Dianne3000

SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit

3,669

edits