Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charles Darwin"
m (Ray Martinez is dead to me.) |
m (I was slightly wrong) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
: Read a credible biography for once. He did not intend to abrogate Christianity, nor did he give it up after his voyage.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 18:15, 9 March 2007 (EST) | : Read a credible biography for once. He did not intend to abrogate Christianity, nor did he give it up after his voyage.--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 18:15, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | : Oops, I stand corrected. He did give up Christianity, but only after his daughter's death. Desmond, Adrian & James Moore (1991), Darwin, London: Michael Joseph, Penguin Group. --[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 18:30, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 23:30, March 9, 2007
Evolution is not an institution to be founded, it is a scientific theory. Darwin was the first to coherently describe part of the process by which it occurs.--Eldepeche 19:20, 21 February 2007 (EST)
Deleted the deathbed recanting lie. There is no point putting a lie and simply saying it needs a citation. --
More deletions
I also deleted the quote mine AND the line about him being worshipped.
Yeah, it looks like the deathbed conversion stroy isn't true. I re-deleted it.
It has not been proved to be un-true. The section is awaiting citation. Do not delete sections until they are documented as untrue. Thank you. --David R 12:09, 22 February 2007 (EST)
- Wait, what? Undocumented claims are to be left in unless they can be proven false? That seems like rather an odd standard of evidence, to say the least... Tsumetai 12:15, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Even the creationists a Answers In Genesis know that it isnt true. You dont put up unsupported lies and just label them as citation needed. You support what you put up.
- Someone else added it, I just marked it as "citation needed" rather than deleting it outright. I just wanted to give people a chance to cite it, as I wasn't sure about it.--Monotreme 12:19, 22 February 2007 (EST)
It was there when I edited it, so I included it with my stuff, but noted that it is only a rumor. But further research shows it is totally untrue, so I took it out of my second edit. There are plenty of facts about Darwin and Darwinsim that demonstrate its a sham - why not put them in its place? I mean, Darwinism is full of lies, lets not sink to their level, ok?
Religious Views
I have completely revamped the Religious Beliefs section. I urge everyone to compare what I wrote with the previous counterfactual drivel.
Ray Martinez 17:50, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Read a credible biography for once. He did not intend to abrogate Christianity, nor did he give it up after his voyage.--AmesG 18:15, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- Oops, I stand corrected. He did give up Christianity, but only after his daughter's death. Desmond, Adrian & James Moore (1991), Darwin, London: Michael Joseph, Penguin Group. --AmesG 18:30, 9 March 2007 (EST)