Difference between revisions of "Talk:Agnosticism"
("God's") |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Could the "God's" be changed to ''"a diety"'' or something like that? | Could the "God's" be changed to ''"a diety"'' or something like that? | ||
| + | --[[User:Funnny|Funnny]] 21:49, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:49, July 10, 2007
Agnostics differ from regular atheists in that they do not deny God's existence
I hesitate to get involved in theological debate here; still less to make changes without agreement, but I should like to suggest that the word 'regular' be deleted from the above sentence. As written it suggests that Agnostics are not 'regular' atheists - ie, that they are some sort of (irregular) atheist. As an agnostic (type 2) myself I'd say that is not the case. The rest of the article makes it quite clear. Agnostics are not atheists, regular or otherwise. Alba 18:13, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
"God's"
"Agnosticism is the belief that God's existence or non existence is unknowable."
Isn't agnosticism the belief that a God's existence is unknowable? This article, in my opinion, sounds like it's saying agnosticism is the belief that solely the existence of the Christian God is unknowable.
Could the "God's" be changed to "a diety" or something like that? --Funnny 21:49, 9 July 2007 (EDT)