Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sam Brownback"
Bob Arctor (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Blogs 4 Brownback == | == Blogs 4 Brownback == | ||
[http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/ Blogs 4 Brownback] was removed from the list of blogs because it's supposedly a "parody." What is the proof of this? It looks legit to me. I don't think arbitrarily removing it was the right thing to do. I'm adding it back and would appreciate a discussion before such actions are taken. --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 01:15, 10 July 2007 (EDT) | [http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/ Blogs 4 Brownback] was removed from the list of blogs because it's supposedly a "parody." What is the proof of this? It looks legit to me. I don't think arbitrarily removing it was the right thing to do. I'm adding it back and would appreciate a discussion before such actions are taken. --[[User:Bob Arctor|Bob Arctor]] 01:15, 10 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/ | ||
| + | |||
| + | You can't convince me that's not a parody. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:54, 10 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:54, July 10, 2007
HarryPalms
I suspect that HarryPalms [contribs] is a vandal. The name is an obvious reference to "hairy palms". Disgusting. Here's what he inserted into this article:
- He cites former Senator Jesse Helms as a model.[1]
I vote to remove this as it is a link to an unreliable and obviously biased source. Actually I'm not even going to wait for a vote. This assertion isn't even cited in the article. Wikipedia also makes such an unsupported assertion. This is an obvious (though subtle) attempt to smear a wonderful principled conservative. -- Bob Arctor 16:24, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
- All sources are biased, just some more so than others. MountainDew 17:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Blogs 4 Brownback
Blogs 4 Brownback was removed from the list of blogs because it's supposedly a "parody." What is the proof of this? It looks legit to me. I don't think arbitrarily removing it was the right thing to do. I'm adding it back and would appreciate a discussion before such actions are taken. --Bob Arctor 01:15, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
http://blogs4brownback.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/heliocentrism-is-an-atheist-doctrine/
You can't convince me that's not a parody. DanH 01:54, 10 July 2007 (EDT)