Difference between revisions of "Talk:Science of global warming"
From Conservapedia
Bwilliston (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Biased Line == | == Biased Line == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 4: | ||
Can you even pretend to be able to source such an outrageous claim? It's lines like this that open this project to ridicule.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 22:31, 9 March 2007 (EST) | Can you even pretend to be able to source such an outrageous claim? It's lines like this that open this project to ridicule.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 22:31, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "Point #1 has become very widely accepted in the past few decades, even by conservatives who were once skeptical." -- Not surprisingly there's no citation for this! "Very widely accepted"?? You don't have to look far to find low temperature records being set. Here's one link: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020507/content/0205071.guest.html [[User:Bwilliston|Bwilliston]] 02:25, 10 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 07:25, March 10, 2007
Biased Line
"Also, these scientists are mostly liberal athiests, untroubled by the hubris that man can destroy the Earth which God gave him"
Can you even pretend to be able to source such an outrageous claim? It's lines like this that open this project to ridicule.--Dave3172 22:31, 9 March 2007 (EST)
"Point #1 has become very widely accepted in the past few decades, even by conservatives who were once skeptical." -- Not surprisingly there's no citation for this! "Very widely accepted"?? You don't have to look far to find low temperature records being set. Here's one link: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020507/content/0205071.guest.html Bwilliston 02:25, 10 March 2007 (EST)
