nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Conservapedia talk:Footnotes - technical help (view source)
Revision as of 09:42, July 13, 2007
, 09:42, July 13, 2007→Footnote style: Add Conservative's comment from elsewhere.
::Do you agree with the broad idea of separate '''sources''' or '''bibliography''' and '''references''' or '''notes''' sections, as I've done in [[Archaeopteryx]]?
::Do you agree with the broad idea of separate '''sources''' or '''bibliography''' and '''references''' or '''notes''' sections, as I've done in [[Archaeopteryx]]?
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:56, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
::[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:56, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
:::<small>''Comment moved from where it was originally posted:''</small>
:::I have been asked to comment on this matter. I don't know how I feel about this. The pro argument is that if a link changes you can find it easier. Also, people can see the source. The con argument is that people don't cite enough as it is now and making it more cumbersome might actually deter sourcing. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:54, 12 July 2007 (EDT)