Difference between revisions of "Neutralism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(various grammatical changes)
m (Reverted edits by Jayjay (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Neutralism was remaining neutral when faith or morality require taking a position or stand.  It was the ducking of moral or religious responsibility.
+
Neutralism is remaining neutral when faith or morality require taking a position or stand.  It is the ducking of moral or religious responsibility.
  
−
The philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real was merely a manifestation of only one substance, One Reality.
+
The philosopher [[Benedict de Spinoza]] advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real is merely a manifestation of only one substance, One Reality.
 
[[category:philosophy]]
 
[[category:philosophy]]
−
[[category:movie]]
+
[[category:religion]]

Revision as of 23:17, July 14, 2007

Neutralism is remaining neutral when faith or morality require taking a position or stand. It is the ducking of moral or religious responsibility.

The philosopher Benedict de Spinoza advocated this approach in the 1600s as a result of his view that mind, matter, time and everything that seems to be real is merely a manifestation of only one substance, One Reality.