5,274
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − + − Line 8:
Line 7: − − ==Open Source vs. Christianity== − Many [[islam]]istic [[terrorism|terrorist]] organizations are funded by Open Source -software developers. Communist-leader [[Richard Stallman]] has stated that Open Source can be used as a successful weapon against Christianity and American freedom. Most of the Open Source advocates are considered to be satan worshippers who openly hate religion.
Reverted edits by Ugalabuuga (Talk); changed back to last version by Jaques
[[Image:Opensource.svg.png|right|100px|thumb|OSI logo]]
[[Image:Opensource.svg.png|right|100px|thumb|OSI logo]]
'''Open Source''' is an act of ''[[communism]]'' and ''[[satanism]]''. Every [[Christian]] should stay away from these "Open Source"-products and stick with the [[Microsoft]] products.
'''Open Source''' is a software development model being promoted by the non-profit '''Open Source Initiative (OSI)''' corporation and other organizations.
==Open Source==
==Open Source==
Open Source refers to software where the [[source code]] is available for anyone to modify. There are many different licenses under which open source software is available<ref>http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical</ref>, all varying slightly to the degree on the conditions under which the software can be modified and redistributed.
Open Source refers to software where the [[source code]] is available for anyone to modify. There are many different licenses under which open source software is available<ref>http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical</ref>, all varying slightly to the degree on the conditions under which the software can be modified and redistributed.
There is a common misconception that open source software must be given away for free, but this is incorrect.<ref>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowDownloadFee</ref> Although most open source software is indeed available for free, with the authors usually charging for consulting and other services, there is no obligation for them to do so.
There is a common misconception that open source software must be given away for free, but this is incorrect.<ref>http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowDownloadFee</ref> Although most open source software is indeed available for free, with the authors usually charging for consulting and other services, there is no obligation for them to do so.
==Examples==
==Examples==