Changes

79 bytes added ,  18:45, July 26, 2007
good, thanks
Line 11: Line 11:     
The citation give by [[Carmentalksnews]] is very questionable - that's why I removed that segment. A promotional website for a newsletter, with "points" depicting what you'll get inside when you purchase it, is not a good source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:38, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
 
The citation give by [[Carmentalksnews]] is very questionable - that's why I removed that segment. A promotional website for a newsletter, with "points" depicting what you'll get inside when you purchase it, is not a good source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 14:38, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Good move.  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:45, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,246

edits