Difference between revisions of "Alcoa case"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removing all content from page)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The decision of ''United States v. Aluminum Co. of America'' (ALCOA), 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945), established that a highly successful business that obtains a [[monopoly]] due to its success can be held in violation of the [[antitrust laws]] against "monopolization".  In this decision, the famous appellate Judge [[Learned Hand]] ruled against ALCOA because it "effectively anticipated and forestalled all competition." ''Id.'' at 431.
 
  
−
[[Category:United States law]]
 

Revision as of 01:40, July 2, 2007