Changes

User talk:SharonS (view source)

Revision as of 20:48, July 29, 2007

2,450 bytes removed , 20:48, July 29, 2007

→‎I would appreciate your support: removed to sysop talk, per andy

Line 104: Line 104:

How do you take something off the spam filter and how do you put something back in the spam filter. I want to make a change to the [[homosexuality]] article and I am having some problems. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]]

−

~~== I would appreciate your support ==~~

−

~~Dear Sharon,~~

−

~~I am sending you a note about the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]] and how it can substantially increase web traffic to Conservapedia.~~

−

The Conservapedia article on [[homosexuality]] is now ranked in the top 10 of http://www.google.com searches. I estimate that the Conservapedia article on homosexuality is giving 300-400 people new people a day to know about Conservapedia who wouldn't otherwise know about it. When the article is in the top 5 of the search engine rankings it will bring in SUBSTANTIALLY more as the top 5 entries get the lion's share of the internet traffic.

−

Now a main reason why the Conservapedia homosexuality article is ranked in the top 10 is that the search engines highly reward articles with footnotes that link to other internet websites. Accordingly, since our uncited template is successful in getting people to cite their material as Andy Schlafly stated, I made note of the uncited template in the following Conservapedia articles:

−

~~Conservapedia:Commandments: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Commandments~~

−

~~Conservapedia Manual of Style: http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Manual_of_Style~~

−

~~Conservapedia:Footnotes - technical help~~

−

~~http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Footnotes_-_technical_help~~

−

Currently about 50% of Conservapedia articles are completely uncited and a high percentage of articles that are cited are poorly cited. If this persist, not many people are going to know about Conservapedia as our articles will be poorly ranked by the search engines. However, I strongly believe that the uncited template will make a substantial difference.

−

My message on the indicated pages clearly indicates the template is to be placed on a article or section of an article that are COMPLETELY uncited. It also gives the template for merely indicating a sentence that is uncited. Lastly, my''' cited''' articles are clearly bringing internet traffic and the uncited articles are not only breaking the conservapedia commandment about citing your sources but they are creating Conservapedia articles filled with unverifiable or hard to verify information. Plus uncited articles are not making a significant impact in regards to bringing in search engine traffic.

−

~~Accordingly, I would appreciate your support regarding the [[Template:Uncited|uncited template]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:18, 29 July 2007 (EDT)~~

TK

nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW

26,487

edits