Changes

== Members ==

== Members ==

The organization consists of seven non-NATO members, [[Algeria]], [[Egypt]], [[Israel]], [[Jordan]], [[Mauritania]], [[Morocco]] and [[Tunisia]]. The original members consisted of Algeria, Maurtiania, Morocco and Tunisia. Algeria joined in 1995 and Jordon joined five years late in 2000.  

The organization consists of seven non-NATO members, [[Algeria]], [[Egypt]], [[Israel]], [[Jordan]], [[Mauritania]], [[Morocco]] and [[Tunisia]]. The original members consisted of [[Algeria]], [[Maurtiania]], [[Morocco]] and [[Tunisia]]. Algeria joined in 1995 and Jordon joined five years late in 2000.  

==Expansion==

==Expansion==

==Structure==

==Structure==

The Mediterranean Dialogue is a voluntary dialogue; meaning that member countries retain their [[sovereignty]]<ref> NATO Deputy Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, February 13, 2006, at the Conference "Nato and Egypt: A Dialogue", http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2006/s060213b.htm </ref>.  All members meet at least twice a year to carry out consultation on [[military]] and [[political]] aspects. The Dialogue is set up to be complimentary to current operations being carried out by other organizations- such as the [[EU]], and [[OSCE]]- in the Mediterranean region.  

The Mediterranean Dialogue is a voluntary dialogue; meaning that member countries retain their [[sovereignty]]<ref>[http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2006/s060213b.htm NATO Deputy Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, February 13, 2006, at the Conference "Nato and Egypt: A Dialogue"]</ref>.  All members meet at least twice a year to carry out consultation on [[military]] and [[political]] aspects. The Dialogue is set up to be complimentary to current operations being carried out by other organizations- such as the [[EU]], and [[OSCE]]- in the Mediterranean region.  

===Organizational Relationship===

===Organizational Relationship===

===Funding===  

===Funding===  

Funding is allocated by members of the alliance through a self-funding basis. Allies consider request for financial assistance in support of a dialogue member’s participation. Members partners agreed to update their funding policy to accommodate their members. One such change was a revision of the Dialogue’s funding policy allowing the Dialogue to fund 100% of the participation cost of Meditrianian Dialogue countries.  

Funding is allocated by members of the alliance through a self-funding basis. Allies consider request for financial assistance in support of a dialogue member’s participation. Members partners agreed to update their funding policy to accommodate their members. One such change was a revision of the Dialogue’s funding policy allowing the Dialogue to fund 100% of the participation cost of Mediterranean Dialogue countries.  

===Military===

===Military===

===Purpose===

===Purpose===

Some have criticized NATO for acting inside the Arab world with the Mediterranean Dialogue, claiming that the [[United States]] and [[NATO]] members are trying to appease terrorist groups operating in some of the Dialogue countries. [[The New Republic]] wrote: “Underlying all this confusion is a major shift in [[Middle East]] policy by the U.S. government which now seeks dialogue with [[Hezbollah]] and the [[Muslim Brotherhood]], both [[Islamist]] groups that avoid ties to [[Al Qaeda]].” <ref> http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w050425&s=braude042905</ref>David Kaplan of [[U.S. News & World Report]] wrote that the one "strategy being pursued is to make peace with radical [[Muslim]] figures who eschew violence. At the top of the list: the Muslim Brotherhood, the pre-eminent Islamist society, founded in 1928 and now with tens of thousands of followers worldwide."<ref> David Kaplan, U.S. News & World Repor, http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w050425&s=braude042905</ref> NATO and the United States state that the reason for the Dialogue is to work with these countries against common threats such as terrorism.

Some have criticized NATO for acting inside the Arab world with the Mediterranean Dialogue, claiming that the [[United States]] and [[NATO]] members are trying to appease terrorist groups operating in some of the Dialogue countries. [[The New Republic]] wrote: “Underlying all this confusion is a major shift in [[Middle East]] policy by the U.S. government which now seeks dialogue with [[Hezbollah]] and the [[Muslim Brotherhood]], both [[Islamist]] groups that avoid ties to [[Al Qaeda]].” <ref> http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w050425&s=braude042905</ref>David Kaplan of [[U.S. News & World Report]] wrote that the one "strategy being pursued is to make peace with radical [[Muslim]] figures who eschew violence. At the top of the list: the Muslim Brotherhood, the pre-eminent Islamist society, founded in 1928 and now with tens of thousands of followers worldwide."<ref> [http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w050425&s=braude042905David Kaplan, U.S. News & World Report]</ref> NATO and the United States state that the reason for the Dialogue is to work with these countries against common threats such as terrorism.

===Success===

===Success===

Some government officials have been critical of the progress that the Mediterranean Duologue has had in working with member countries. Styptics warn that the Duologue may be seen by [[Middle East]] countries as a way of drawing [[Israel]] closer to NATO<ref>http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2004/issue1/english/art3.html</ref>. They state the if this happens, anti-western tensions in the Middle East will rise. Critic's also say that NATO has lacked the willpower to send enough resources to the Duologue in order for it to operate effectively in building ties with Arab countries<ref>Chris Donnelly, Senior Fellow at the United Kingdom Defence Academy in Shrivenham, England, NATO Review, Spring 2004 Issue http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2004/issue1/english/art3.html</ref>.  

Some government officials have been critical of the progress that the Mediterranean Duologue has had in working with member countries. Styptics warn that the Duologue may be seen by [[Middle East]] countries as a way of drawing [[Israel]] closer to NATO<ref>http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2004/issue1/english/art3.html</ref>. They state the if this happens, anti-western tensions in the Middle East will rise. Critic's also say that NATO has lacked the willpower to send enough resources to the Duologue in order for it to operate effectively in building ties with Arab countries<ref> [http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2004/issue1/english/art3.html Chris Donnelly, Senior Fellow at the United Kingdom Defence Academy in Shrivenham, England, NATO Review, Spring 2004 Issue]</ref>.  

==External Links==

==External Links==

*[http://www.nato.int/med-dial/summary.htm Meditrianian Dialogue Officail Website]

*[http://www.nato.int/med-dial/summary.htm Mediterranean Dialogue Official Website]

==References==

==References==