19
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 00:40, August 18, 2007
, 00:40, August 18, 2007A word about wikipedia (see buttom)
Another category that was deleted was the list of users who are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/June_2007#Category:Wikipedians_who_homeschool homeschooled]. Again, the claim was that the category wasn't useful, but I think that wiki wants to prevent homeschoolers from organizing so that we can't share ideas. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 17:27, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
Another category that was deleted was the list of users who are [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/June_2007#Category:Wikipedians_who_homeschool homeschooled]. Again, the claim was that the category wasn't useful, but I think that wiki wants to prevent homeschoolers from organizing so that we can't share ideas. [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 17:27, 4 August 2007 (EDT)
== A word about wikipedia ==
It is '''people''' who write the articles, and since many (as you Americans call liberals) are using wikipedia and editing it, it is simply unavoidable that a small bias will show. Do take into account the VAST numbers of articles and compare them to the ones that are biased I am pretty sure it wont be a big percantage. How can this be corrected? By going in there and editing for yourself and make sure that you can back up your claims with reliable sources. Obvious transgresions by the administrators of wikipedia can be taken higher up, all the way to the top. And if someone believes that every single administartor all the way to the top is currupt advocate of the devil who only wishes to hide the truth...then I can only say your probably paranoid. --[[User:Sachaztan|Sachaztan]] 20:40, 17 August 2007 (EDT)