Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
20 bytes added ,  00:07, August 28, 2007
m
Line 62: Line 62:  
Theists often criticize atheism as being contrary to persuasive argument.  [[Arguments for the existence of God]] include:
 
Theists often criticize atheism as being contrary to persuasive argument.  [[Arguments for the existence of God]] include:
 
* [[Teleological argument]]: The universe exhibits overwhelming evidence of deliberate, intelligent, purposeful design, which implies an [[intelligent design]]er;
 
* [[Teleological argument]]: The universe exhibits overwhelming evidence of deliberate, intelligent, purposeful design, which implies an [[intelligent design]]er;
−
* [[Cosmological argument]]: Every event in our universe necessarily has a cause.  However, it is impossible that there should be an unending chain of causes going back.  Therefore, there necessarily must be a cause ''distinct'' from the universe as we know it which is capable of causing all things and is itself uncaused.  That [[First Cause]] is God.
+
* [[Cosmological argument]]: Every event in our universe necessarily has a cause.  However, it is impossible that there should be an unending chain of causes going back.  Therefore, there necessarily must be a cause ''distinct'' from the universe as we know it which is capable of causing all things and is itself uncaused.  Atheism denies that that [[First Cause]] is God.
 
* [[Ontological argument]]: Since existence is inherent to the definition of God, it is impossible to conceive of God without conceiving of Him as existing;
 
* [[Ontological argument]]: Since existence is inherent to the definition of God, it is impossible to conceive of God without conceiving of Him as existing;
 
* Historical arguments for the existence of God: Arguments stemming from historical accounts and archaeological evidence;
 
* Historical arguments for the existence of God: Arguments stemming from historical accounts and archaeological evidence;
72

edits

Navigation menu