Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservative links"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Evolution)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
Since you are now linking this article to dozens of others, I suggest it be locked...or maybe turned into a template?  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:36, 3 September 2007 (EDT)
 
Since you are now linking this article to dozens of others, I suggest it be locked...or maybe turned into a template?  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:36, 3 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Evolution ==
 +
 +
This is an awesome page. Thanks for all the work on it, guys. I was wondering why Evolution is listed under Sexuality, though. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:58, 6 September 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:58, September 7, 2007

Joaquín, thanks for creating this article. --Crocoite 10:22, 1 September 2007 (EDT)

Reorder in Alpha order?

It would be easier to follow the topics if they were in Alphabetical order. What do you think? --Crocoite 10:32, 1 September 2007 (EDT)

Thank you for your comment. Please do whatever you think that could improve the article. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:01, 2 September 2007 (EDT)

Locking?

Since you are now linking this article to dozens of others, I suggest it be locked...or maybe turned into a template? --şŷŝôρ-₮KṢρёаќǃ 22:36, 3 September 2007 (EDT)

Evolution

This is an awesome page. Thanks for all the work on it, guys. I was wondering why Evolution is listed under Sexuality, though. DanH 23:58, 6 September 2007 (EDT)