Changes

: It's gossip.  It's not educational.  We're not Wikipedia where nearly every entry has some gossip in it.  Feel free to see what other editors think, but that's my view.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:06, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

: It's gossip.  It's not educational.  We're not Wikipedia where nearly every entry has some gossip in it.  Feel free to see what other editors think, but that's my view.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:06, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

::I've got to wonder where the line is drawn for this.  This site still needs so many fundamental topics covered, but since January there's been an article on Chappaquiddick, but CP doesn't want to include the dirty bits of people's biographies? And before you say it, I'm not Ted Kennedy fan, but I just about lost it when "Random page" led me that article. Where are the priorities? :p Anyway, the "gossip" argument doesn't hold much weight imo. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:02, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

::I've got to wonder where the line is drawn for this.  This site still needs so many fundamental topics covered, but since January there's been an article on Chappaquiddick.  Still, CP doesn't want to include the dirty bits of people's biographies? Hunh.

 

::And before you say it, I'm no Ted Kennedy fan (if I had a vote in MA. I doubt I'd have ever voted for him), but I just about lost it when "Random page" led me that article. Where are the priorities? :p Anyway, the "gossip" argument doesn't hold much weight imo. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:02, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

It is not gossip, it is part of his biograpghy. ref <http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/10/10/rush.limbaugh/>

It is not gossip, it is part of his biograpghy. ref <http://www.cnn.com/2003/SHOWBIZ/10/10/rush.limbaugh/>