325
edits
Changes
User talk:Aziraphale/Arbitration (view source)
Revision as of 20:53, September 7, 2007
, 20:53, September 7, 2007→Primary: moot?
:Still, when I can focus on this window with a little more concentration (multi-tasking with work tasks at the moment) I think breaking out any conversations on [[User:Aziraphale/Arbitration]] like this would be a good idea. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:57, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's all I got tuh say about tha-at...
:Still, when I can focus on this window with a little more concentration (multi-tasking with work tasks at the moment) I think breaking out any conversations on [[User:Aziraphale/Arbitration]] like this would be a good idea. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 15:57, 7 September 2007 (EDT) ''<-that's all I got tuh say about tha-at...
''
''
::Well, I was going by [[User:conservative|Conservative's]] post, which seemed to indicate that his arguments were already at [[Talk:Atheism|Atheism's]] talk page. If that '''was''' the case then the side-by-side would be the way to go since it didn't look like he was going to want or need any further input. If he changes his position in regard to input on the arbitration page then this format might well be rendered moot. [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 16:53, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
<!-- uncomment this if you want a color code
<!-- uncomment this if you want a color code