Difference between revisions of "Three-Fifths Compromise"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(undeadend)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
The '''Three-Fifths Compromise''' states that five [[slave]]s would count as three people in determining the [[population]] for [[tax]]ing and [[representation]].  
+
At the [[Constitutional Convention]], there was some debate over whether slaves should be counted as part of the population determining the number of seats in the [[House of Representative]] granted to each state.  The '''Three-Fifths Compromise''' was the solution to this problem.  It determined that five [[slave]]s would count as three people in determining the [[population]] for [[tax]]ing and [[representation]]. <ref>U.S Government and Politics</ref>
  
 
It was proposed in 1787 by [[James Wilson]] at the [[Constitutional Convention]]. The Compromise was introduced as a solution between the Southern and Northern States over how to count slaves in the regard of taxation determining representation in the [[House of Representatives]].This permitted southern slave holding states to count each of their slaves as 3/5th's of their population. After much debate, they settled the issue by allowing the slaves to be counted as three fifths of a person, not a full person. Although the slaves were not counted completely as "property" some still were unsatisfied, and wished to be thought fully as, "people".<ref>The Three Fifths Compromise[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_Three-fifths_compromise]</ref>
 
It was proposed in 1787 by [[James Wilson]] at the [[Constitutional Convention]]. The Compromise was introduced as a solution between the Southern and Northern States over how to count slaves in the regard of taxation determining representation in the [[House of Representatives]].This permitted southern slave holding states to count each of their slaves as 3/5th's of their population. After much debate, they settled the issue by allowing the slaves to be counted as three fifths of a person, not a full person. Although the slaves were not counted completely as "property" some still were unsatisfied, and wished to be thought fully as, "people".<ref>The Three Fifths Compromise[http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_Three-fifths_compromise]</ref>
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
 
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
 +
[[Category:United States Government]]

Revision as of 00:16, September 15, 2007

At the Constitutional Convention, there was some debate over whether slaves should be counted as part of the population determining the number of seats in the House of Representative granted to each state. The Three-Fifths Compromise was the solution to this problem. It determined that five slaves would count as three people in determining the population for taxing and representation. [1]

It was proposed in 1787 by James Wilson at the Constitutional Convention. The Compromise was introduced as a solution between the Southern and Northern States over how to count slaves in the regard of taxation determining representation in the House of Representatives.This permitted southern slave holding states to count each of their slaves as 3/5th's of their population. After much debate, they settled the issue by allowing the slaves to be counted as three fifths of a person, not a full person. Although the slaves were not counted completely as "property" some still were unsatisfied, and wished to be thought fully as, "people".[2]

References

  1. ↑ U.S Government and Politics
  2. ↑ The Three Fifths Compromise[1]