3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 97:
Line 97: + +
→Space Ship Theory
this has as much scientific backup as the information stated in the article. very nice theory --[[User:Completeliberal|Completeliberal]] 23:13, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
this has as much scientific backup as the information stated in the article. very nice theory --[[User:Completeliberal|Completeliberal]] 23:13, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:Care to get into specifics? Unless you do, this reply to a six-month-old comment is pointless. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:26, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
:Care to get into specifics? Unless you do, this reply to a six-month-old comment is pointless. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:26, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
specifics? i'm talking about the theory with regards to the existence of Noah's ark. can you prove this? yeah it might be in the bible. but many things in the bible were scientifically incorrect-for example the stories of adam and eve. these were obviously proved wrong. yeah i respect the bibles teachings of good morals yet the facts in it are wrong. my issue with this site is that it is an educational resource yet encourages ignorance. --[[User:Completeliberal|W]] 23:43, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
== why is this page locked? ==
== why is this page locked? ==