nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 99:
Line 99: + + + +
→Space Ship Theory: What errors?
specifics? i'm talking about the theory with regards to the existence of Noah's ark. can you prove this? yeah it might be in the bible. but many things in the bible were scientifically incorrect-for example the stories of adam and eve. these were obviously proved wrong. yeah i respect the bibles teachings of good morals yet the facts in it are wrong. my issue with this site is that it is an educational resource yet encourages ignorance. --[[User:Completeliberal|nomen]] 23:44, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
specifics? i'm talking about the theory with regards to the existence of Noah's ark. can you prove this? yeah it might be in the bible. but many things in the bible were scientifically incorrect-for example the stories of adam and eve. these were obviously proved wrong. yeah i respect the bibles teachings of good morals yet the facts in it are wrong. my issue with this site is that it is an educational resource yet encourages ignorance. --[[User:Completeliberal|nomen]] 23:44, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
: Can I prove that Noah's Ark existed? What sort of proof would you like? I can't give scientific proof, because it's ''history'', i.e. outside the realm of science. But I can point you to ''historical'' evidence, such as the Bible.
: What is "scientifically incorrect" about Adam and Eve? And how and where were they "proved" wrong? And what other supposed "wrong facts" does the Bible contain? I don't know of any, despite studying it for many years.
: And despite me asking for specifics (which you did to some extent), you then come out with another unsubstantiated over-generalisation, that this site "encourages ignorance". Where, specifically, does it do that?
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:42, 26 September 2007 (EDT)
== why is this page locked? ==
== why is this page locked? ==