Eugenie Scott objected to a film about evolution and intelligent design
Line 1:
Line 1:
+
Eugenie Scott objected to a film about evolution and intelligent design because it would "[depict] the scientific community as intolerant, as close-minded, and as persecuting those who disagree with them. And this is simply wrong". Yet the evidence, as reported by ''The New York Times'' article quoting her, shows that evolutionists are intolerant and close-minded and do persecute those who disagree with them.
+
+
The article simply declares that evolution has no valid scientific objections to it.
+
+
The article gives an example of an academic whose anti-evolution article was published and who then lost tenure.
+
+
This is typical behavior of liberals. When evidence of their misdeeds are made public, they simply deny the truth and blame the revealers.