Difference between revisions of "Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
who left this stub here like this? | who left this stub here like this? | ||
| − | I believe science is objective, and therefore we should have as many different view points in the scientific community as there are scientists. Obviously not every view point in | + | I believe science is objective, and therefore we should have as many different view points in the scientific community as there are scientists. Obviously not every view point can be taught in schools but they ought to be theaching the main ones. |
| + | So I think the main point of this question is: Is creationism a main point of view? | ||
| + | I'll get to that, but first as to Intelligent design. | ||
[[category:conservapedia Debates]] | [[category:conservapedia Debates]] | ||
Revision as of 22:40, October 4, 2007
No. who left this stub here like this?
I believe science is objective, and therefore we should have as many different view points in the scientific community as there are scientists. Obviously not every view point can be taught in schools but they ought to be theaching the main ones. So I think the main point of this question is: Is creationism a main point of view? I'll get to that, but first as to Intelligent design.