Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hippocrates"
From Conservapedia
JesusSaves (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not sure the less sentence is necessary or fair. --[[User:John|John]] 23:42, 9 March 2007 (EST) | Not sure the less sentence is necessary or fair. --[[User:John|John]] 23:42, 9 March 2007 (EST) | ||
:I slightly rewrote it. I think "profit" is not really a neutral formulation, and also, one does not need to be a physician to "profit" from it, but one does need to be a physician to take this oath and be bound by it. Also, I explicitly inserted "in its original formulation", as there are many variants in use today that do not include the statement on induced abortion. One can of course argue whether these are "false oaths", but I think that referring to "the original formulation" is a clear and accurate statement. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 07:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | :I slightly rewrote it. I think "profit" is not really a neutral formulation, and also, one does not need to be a physician to "profit" from it, but one does need to be a physician to take this oath and be bound by it. Also, I explicitly inserted "in its original formulation", as there are many variants in use today that do not include the statement on induced abortion. One can of course argue whether these are "false oaths", but I think that referring to "the original formulation" is a clear and accurate statement. [[User:PaulB|PaulB]] 07:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Added crosslink to "Oath of Hippocrates". I considered deleting the restatement of part of the Oath, but decided against it since it is the lead in to the following sentence. <font color=navy>[[User:JesusSaves|JesusSaves]] 07:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)</font> | ||
Revision as of 11:23, March 13, 2007
Not sure the less sentence is necessary or fair. --John 23:42, 9 March 2007 (EST)
- I slightly rewrote it. I think "profit" is not really a neutral formulation, and also, one does not need to be a physician to "profit" from it, but one does need to be a physician to take this oath and be bound by it. Also, I explicitly inserted "in its original formulation", as there are many variants in use today that do not include the statement on induced abortion. One can of course argue whether these are "false oaths", but I think that referring to "the original formulation" is a clear and accurate statement. PaulB 07:15, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
Added crosslink to "Oath of Hippocrates". I considered deleting the restatement of part of the Oath, but decided against it since it is the lead in to the following sentence. JesusSaves 07:22, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
