Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lewis "Scooter" Libby"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Opinionated paragraphs)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
== Opinionated paragraphs ==
 
== Opinionated paragraphs ==
 
I favor deleting the last 3 paragraphs as opinionated, misleading, and repetitive. They start with "Libby is the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid-1980s." Huh? I didn't think that anyone was convicted in Iran-Contra. North and Poindexter won on appeal. Then there is some out-of-place criticism of the Wash. Post, and a useless comment about legal experts being not surprised. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I favor deleting the last 3 paragraphs as opinionated, misleading, and repetitive. They start with "Libby is the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid-1980s." Huh? I didn't think that anyone was convicted in Iran-Contra. North and Poindexter won on appeal. Then there is some out-of-place criticism of the Wash. Post, and a useless comment about legal experts being not surprised. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 16:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==format==
 +
 +
The format of this article is bizarre and incomprehensible.  It sounds like something that was copied from elsewhere.  --[[User:WOVcenter|WOVcenter]] 00:16, 14 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:16, March 14, 2007

I believe his full name is Irving Lewis "Scooter" Libby. But then I'm not a citable source. --Cracker 14:03, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

He's nearly universally referred to as Lewis "Scooter" Libby. I'll move the page there. --Hojimachong 14:05, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
Yes, this is true, I wasn't faulting you just pointing it out.--Cracker 14:08, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
I know. And yes, I checked, and his full name is Irving Lewis Libby :D. --Hojimachong 14:10, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Opinionated paragraphs

I favor deleting the last 3 paragraphs as opinionated, misleading, and repetitive. They start with "Libby is the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid-1980s." Huh? I didn't think that anyone was convicted in Iran-Contra. North and Poindexter won on appeal. Then there is some out-of-place criticism of the Wash. Post, and a useless comment about legal experts being not surprised. RSchlafly 16:48, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

format

The format of this article is bizarre and incomprehensible. It sounds like something that was copied from elsewhere. --WOVcenter 00:16, 14 March 2007 (EDT)